.png){kind=icon}
返回
Message effects on psychological reactance: meta-analyses
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1093/hcr/hqaf016.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Psychological reactance is one of the underlying mechanisms of message effects on persuasion outcomes. We conducted meta-analyses across 28 articles, comprising 33 studies and 146 effect sizes (2005-2024), to examine (a) message effects on psychological reactance and (b) the influence of psychological reactance on persuasion outcomes. Results showed that high freedom-threatening language increased anger (k = 28, r = .21), negative cognitions (k = 25, r = .17), and psychological reactance (k = 53, r = .20) compared to low freedom-threatening language. These effects were moderated by behavior repetitiveness and communication modality. However, gain vs. loss framing showed no significant differences in anger (k = 6, r = -.03), negative cognitions (k = 6, r = -.01), or psychological reactance (k = 12, r = -.02). Both anger (r = -.23, k = 42) and negative cognitions (r = -.18, k = 39) were negatively associated with persuasion outcomes.
Keyword:
psychological reactance
message effects
meta-analysis
random-effects model
multilevel meta-analysis
期刊
H
IF:
3.3
论文数:
38
被引数:
4.6K
机构
引用论文
Testing Psychological Inoculation to Reduce Reactance to Vaccine-Related Communication.png)
HEALTH COMMUNICATIONOAAI
HEALTH COMMUNICATIONIF2.7
OAAI分享收藏
Beyond Counterarguing? Comparing Multiple Measures of Cognitive Resistance for Psychological Reactance Using the Avoidance, Contesting, and Empowering (ACE) Resistance TypologyMOTIVATION SCIENCE
MOTIVATION SCIENCEIF3.3
PREAI
分享收藏Not All Promotion Is Good Promotion: The Pitfalls of Overexaggerated Claims and Controlling Language in Exercise Messaging并非所有的宣传都是好的宣传：运动信息传播中过度夸张的宣称和控制性语言的陷阱
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容