arrow
返回

Method ruggedness studies incorporating a risk based approach: A tutorial

delete2011-10-01
delete30
PRE
AI
P
Phil J. Borman *
M
Marion J. Chatfield
I
Ivana Damjanov
P
Patrick Jackson
DOI:10.1016/j.aca.2011.07.008delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
This tutorial explains how well thought-out application of design and analysis methodology, combined with risk assessment, leads to improved assessment of method ruggedness. The authors define analytical method ruggedness as an experimental evaluation of noise factors such as analyst, instrument or stationary phase batch. Ruggedness testing is usually performed upon transfer of a method to another laboratory, however, it can also be employed during method development when an assessment of the method's inherent variability is required. The use of a ruggedness study provides a more rigorous method for assessing method precision than a simple comparative intermediate precision study which is typically performed as part of method validation. Prior to designing a ruggedness study, factors that are likely to have a significant effect on the performance of the method should be identified (via a risk assessment) and controlled where appropriate. Noise factors that are not controlled are considered for inclusion in the study. The purpose of the study should be to challenge the method and identify whether any noise factors significantly affect the method's precision. The results from the study are firstly used to identify any special cause variability due to specific attributable circumstances. Secondly, common cause variability is apportioned to determine which factors are responsible for most of the variability. The total common cause variability can then be used to assess whether the method's precision requirements are achievable. The approach used to design and analyse method ruggedness studies will be covered in this tutorial using a real example. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Precision
Variance
Components
Noise
Variability
Ruggedness

期刊

Analytica Chimica Acta 封面图
Analytica Chimica Acta
IF:
6
论文数:
3.3W
被引数:
6.1W

机构

G
GlaxoSmithKline
学者数:
1.8W
论文数: 9.6K
被引数: 39
引用论文

引用论文

err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
err分享
err收藏
Ruggedness and robustness testing
err2007-07-01
err203
PREAI
errDejaegher, Bieke; Vander Heyden, Yvan
err分享
err收藏
POST-POLIO SYNDROME: PSYCHOLOGICAL ADJUSTMENT TO DISABILITY
err2009-07-09
err0
PREAI
errLisa Hollingsworth; Mary J. Didelot; Caryn Levington
err分享
err收藏
Acceptance Criteria for Method Equivalency Assessments
err2009-11-19
err30
PREAI
errChatfield, Marion J.; Borman, Phil J.
err分享
err收藏
A description of sleep behaviour in healthy late pregnancy, and the accuracy of self-reports
err2016-05-18
err0
errOAAI
errJordan P. R. McIntyre; Cayley M. Ingham; B. Lynne Hutchinson; John M. D. Thompson; Lesley M. McCowan; Peter R. Stone; Andrew G. Veale; Robin Cronin; Alistair W Stewart; Kevin M. Ellyett; Edwin A. Mitchell
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Feasibility and Efficacy of Post-Transplant Consolidation Immunotherapy with Nivolumab Supported By the Reinfusion of Unselected Autologous Lymphocytes in Patients Affected By Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma异基因移植后巩固性免疫治疗(使用Nivolumab联合回输未筛选的自体淋巴细胞)在复发/难治性霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中的可行性与有效性
err2018-11-29
err0
errOAAI
errFabio Guolo; Paola Minetto; Filippo Ballerini; Filippo Antonio Canale; Michela Frello; Elisa Coviello; Lorenzo Manconi; Annalisa Kunkl; Elisabetta Tedone; Rosa Mangerini; Paola Contini; Daniela Fenoglio; Maurizio Miglino; Alessandra Bo; Maria Carla De Luigi; Maria Rosaria Ruzzenenti; Paolo Carlier; Alberto Serio; Silvia Luchetti; Emanuela Marcenaro; Paolo Strada; Jean Louis Ravetti; Marco Gobbi; Roberto Massimo Lemoli
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容