arrow
返回

Methods for Developing Patient-Reported Outcome-Based Performance Measures (PRO-PMs)

delete2015-06-01
delete102
delete
OA
AI
E
Ethan Basch *
J
John A. Spertus
R
R. Adams Dudley
A
Albert W. Wu
C
Cynthia Chuahan
P
Perry Cohen
M
Mary Lou Smith
N
Nick Black
A
Amaris Crawford
C
Christensen, Ken
K
Kathleen Blake
C
Christine Goertz
DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.018delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Objective: To recommend methods for assessing quality of care via patient-reported outcome-based performance measures (PRO-PMs) of symptoms, functional status, and quality of life. Methods: A Technical Expert Panel was assembled by the American Medical Association-convened Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement. An environmental scan and structured literature review were conducted to identify quality programs that integrate PRO-PMs. Key methodological considerations in the design, implementation, and analysis of these PRO PM data were systematically identified. Recommended methods for addressing each identified consideration were developed on the basis of published patient-reported outcome (PRO) standards and refined through public comment. Literature review focused on programs using PROs to assess performance and on PRO guidance documents. Results: Thirteen PRO programs and 10 guidance documents were identified. Nine best practices were developed, including the following: provide a rationale for measuring the outcome and for using a PRO PM; describe the context of use; select a measure that is meaningful to patients with adequate psychometric properties; provide evidence of the measure's sensitivity to differences in care; address missing data and risk adjustment; and provide a framework for implementation, interpretation, dissemination, and continuous refinement. Conclusion: methods for integrating PROs into performance measurement are available.
Keyword:
patient-reported outcome
performance measurement
PRO-PM
quality
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Value in Health 封面图
Value in Health
IF:
6
论文数:
4.4W
被引数:
1.5W

机构

U
university of california san francisco
学者数:
5.3W
论文数: 4.0W
被引数: 67
U
university of north carolina
学者数:
7.4W
论文数: 6.5W
被引数: 93
M
mayo clinic
学者数:
8.3W
论文数: 6.6W
被引数: 85
J
Johns Hopkins University
学者数:
10.2W
论文数: 8.8W
被引数: 13.0W
U
university of london
学者数:
21.5W
论文数: 19.7W
被引数: 305
University of California System 封面图
University of California System
学者数:
37.7W
论文数: 33.8W
被引数: 6.6K
U
university of missouri kansas city
学者数:
3.9K
论文数: 3.3K
被引数: 3
U
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
学者数:
3.9W
论文数: 3.1W
被引数: 46
J
johns hopkins bloomberg school of public health
学者数:
1.7W
论文数: 1.4W
被引数: 18
University of Missouri System 封面图
University of Missouri System
学者数:
3.0W
论文数: 2.7W
被引数: 75
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature
err2008-01-04
err584
PREAI
errValderas, J. M.; Kotzeva, A.; Espallargues, M.; Guyatt, G.; Ferrans, C. E.; Halyard, M. Y.; Revicki, D. A.; Symonds, T.; Parada, A.; Alonso, J.
err分享
err收藏
Methodological Standards and Patient-Centeredness in Comparative Effectiveness Research The PCORI Perspective比较有效性研究中的方法学标准和以患者为中心pcari视角
err2012-04-18
err205
PREAI
errBasch, Ethan; Aronson, Naomi; Berg, Alfred; Flum, David; Gabriel, Sherine; Goodman, Steven N.; Helfand, Mark; Ioannidis, John P. A.; Lauer, Michael; Meltzer, David; Mittman, Brian; Newhouse, Robin; Normand, Sharon-Lise; Schneeweiss, Sebastian; Slutsky, Jean; Tinetti, Mary; Yancy, Clyde
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes
err2010-07-01
err3.1K
errOAAI
errMokkink, Lidwine B.; Terwee, Caroline B.; Patrick, Donald L.; Alonso, Jordi; Stratford, Paul W.; Knol, Dirk L.; Bouter, Lex M.; de Vet, Henrica C. W.
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容