arrow
返回

Methods for Evaluating Causality in Observational Studies

delete2020-02-14
delete51
delete
OA
AI
E
Emilio Gianicolo *
M
Martin Eichler
O
Oliver J. Muensterer
K
Konstantin Strauch
M
Maria Blettner
DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2020.0101delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Background: In clinical medical research. causality is demonstrated by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Often, however, an RCT cannot be conducted for ethical reasons, and sometimes for practical reasons as well. In such cases, knowledge can be derived from an observational study instead. In this article, we present two methods that have not been widely used in medical research to date. Methods: The methods of assessing causal inferences in observational studies are described on the basis of publications retrieved by a selective literature search. Results: Two relatively new approaches-regression-discontinuity methods and interrupted time series-can be used to demonstrate a causal relationship under certain circumstances. The regression-discontinuity design is a quasi-experimental approach that can be applied if a continuous assignment variable is used with a threshold value. Patients are assigned to different treatment schemes on the basis of the threshold value. For assignment variables that are subject to random measurement error, it is assumed that, in a small interval around a threshold value, e.g.. cholesterol values of 160 mg/dL, subjects are assigned essentially at random to one of two treatment groups. If patients with a value above the threshold are given a certain treatment, those with values below the threshold can serve as control group. Interrupted time series are a special type of regression-discontinuity design in which time is the assignment variable, and the threshold is a cutoff point. This is often an extemal event, such as the imposition of a smoking ban. A before-and-after comparison can be used to determine the effect of the intervention (e.g.. the smoking ban) on health parameters such as the frequency of cardiovascular disease. Conclusion: The approaches described here can be used to derive causal inferences from observational studies. They should only be applied after the prerequisites for their use have been carefully checked.
Keyword:
REGRESSION DISCONTINUITY DESIGNS
PUBLIC-HEALTH
SERIES
EPIDEMIOLOGY

期刊

D
Deutsches Arzteblatt International
IF:
7.1
论文数:
4.9K
被引数:
9.5K

机构

J
Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
学者数:
2.4W
论文数: 1.8W
被引数: 28
C
carl gustav carus university hospital
学者数:
5.4K
论文数: 4.1K
被引数: 1
T
Technische Universitat Dresden
学者数:
3.2W
论文数: 2.5W
被引数: 249
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

Causation in epidemiology
err2001-12-01
err174
errOAAI
errParascandola, M; Weed, DL
err分享
err收藏
ESTIMATING MARGINAL RETURNS TO MEDICAL CARE: EVIDENCE FROM AT-RISK NEWBORNS
err2010-05-01
err150
errOAAI
errAlmond, Douglas; Doyle, Joseph J., Jr.; Kowalski, Amanda E.; Williams, Heidi
err分享
err收藏
Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 7: assessing the assumptions
err2017-09-01
err93
errOAAI
errBaernighausen, Till; Oldenburg, Catherine; Tugwell, Peter; Bommer, Christian; Ebert, Cara; Barreto, Mauricio; Djimeu, Eric; Haber, Noah; Waddington, Hugh; Rockers, Peter; Sianesi, Barbara; Bor, Jacob; Fink, Gunther; Valentine, Jeffrey; Tanner, Jeffrey; Stanley, Tom; Sierra, Eduardo; Tchetgen, Eric Tchetgen; Atun, Rifat; Vollmer, Sebastian
err分享
err收藏
err2016-07-26
err0
errOAAI
err
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Causal criteria: time has come for a revision
err2019-01-16
err21
PREAI
errOlsen, Jorn; Jensen, Uffe Juul
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容