返回
Moderating borderline content while respecting fundamental values
DOI:10.1002/poi3.376.png)
摘要
En 中文
As efforts to identify and remove online terrorist and violent extremist content have intensified, concern has also grown about so-called lawful but awful content. Various options have been touted for reducing the visibility of this borderline content, including removing it from search and recommendation algorithms, downranking it and redirecting those who search for it. This article contributes to this discussion by considering the moderation of such content, in terms of three sets of values. First, definitional clarity. This is necessary to provide users with fair warning of what content is liable to moderation and to place limits on the discretion of content moderators. Yet, at present, definitions of borderline content are vague and imprecise. Second, necessity and proportionality. While downranking and removal from search and recommender algorithms should be distinguished from deplatforming, tech companies' efforts to deamplify borderline content give rise to many of the same concerns as content removal and account shutdowns. Third, transparency. While a number of platforms now publish their content moderation policies and transparency data reports, these largely focus on violative, not borderline content. Moreover, there remain questions around access to data for independent researchers and transparency at the level of the individual user.
Keyword:
algorithms
borderline
content
content moderation
freedom of expression
recommendation
terrorist and violent extremist content
transparency
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
P
IF:
3.6
论文数:
320
被引数:
1.3K
机构
引用论文
The Potential of Spatial Computing to Augment Memory: Investigating Recall in Virtual Memory Palaces空间计算增强记忆的潜力:探究虚拟记忆宫殿中的回忆
Motivational Impact of Virtual Reality on Game-Based Learning: Comparative Study of Immersive and Non-Immersive Approaches虚拟现实对游戏化学习动机影响的比较研究:沉浸式与非沉浸式方法

