arrow
返回

Modified Einstein versus modified Euler for dark matter

delete2023-06-22
delete4
PRE
AI
C
Camille Bonvin *
L
Levon Pogosian
DOI:10.1038/s41550-023-02003-ydelete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Our current cosmological observations cannot distinguish between a cosmological model with a fifth force acting on dark matter and one for which the laws of gravity are modified. Instead, a method using future gravitational redshift data is proposed. Modifications of general relativity generically contain additional degrees of freedom that can mediate forces between matter particles. One of the common manifestations of a fifth force in alternative gravity theories is a difference between the gravitational potentials felt by relativistic and non-relativistic particles, also known as 'the gravitational slip'. In contrast, a fifth force between dark matter particles, owing to dark sector interaction, does not cause a gravitational slip, making the latter a possible 'smoking gun' of modified gravity. Here we point out that a force acting on dark matter particles, as in models of coupled quintessence, would also manifest itself as a measurement of an effective gravitational slip by cosmological surveys of large-scale structure. This is linked to the fact that redshift-space distortions owing to peculiar motion of galaxies do not provide a measurement of the true gravitational potential if dark matter is affected by a fifth force. Hence, it is extremely challenging to distinguish a dark sector interaction from a modification of gravity with cosmological data alone. Future observations of gravitational redshift from galaxy surveys can help to break the degeneracy between these possibilities, by providing a direct measurement of the distortion of time. We discuss this and other possible ways to resolve this important question.
Keyword:
SPACE
GROWTH
TENSOR

期刊

Nature Astronomy 封面图
Nature Astronomy
IF:
14.3
论文数:
2.8K
被引数:
1.3W

机构

S
Simon Fraser University
学者数:
1.0W
论文数: 1.0W
被引数: 1.4W
U
university of geneva
学者数:
3.6W
论文数: 2.9W
被引数: 35
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容