.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
Modularity is a concept central to cognitive science, and Fodor's analysis of cognitive modularity in his book The Modularity Of Mind has been widely influential widely misunderstood. It is often claimed that the possession of some or other system-property is a necessary condition for that system to be modular in Fodor's sense, but Fodor made it clear that he was not proposing a definition of modularity, nor proposing any necessary conditions for the applicability of the term. He was simply suggesting a number of system properties that are typical of modular systems. I argue that it is nevertheless possible to derive a useful definition of modularity from the inds of arguments put forward by Fodor: A cognitive system is modular when and only when it is domain-specific. Given any such proposed module, the other features of modularity discussed by Fodor should be dealt with as empirical issues: for each feature (innateness, for example), it is an empirical question whether or not the proposed module has that feature.
Keyword:
PROSOPAGNOSIA
ALEXIA
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
17.2
论文数:
3.6K
被引数:
3.5W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏Use of nano-metal particles as catalyst under electromagnetic heating for in-situ heavy oil recovery.png)
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容