arrow
返回

Monitoring global supply chains

delete2015-09-21
delete143
delete
OA
AI
J
Jodi L. Short *
M
Michael W. Toffel
A
Andrea R. Hugill
DOI:10.1002/smj.2417delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Research summary: Firms seeking to avoid reputational spillovers that can arise from dangerous, illegal, and unethical behavior at supply chain factories are increasingly relying on private social auditors to provide strategic information about suppliers' conduct. But little is known about what influences auditors' ability to identify and report problems. Our analysis of nearly 17,000 supplier audits reveals that auditors report fewer violations when individual auditors have audited the factory before, when audit teams are less experienced or less trained, when audit teams are all male, and when audits are paid for by the audited supplier. This first comprehensive and systematic analysis of supply chain monitoring identifies previously overlooked transaction costs and suggests strategies to develop governance structures to mitigate reputational risks by reducing information asymmetries in supply chains.Managerial summary: Firms reliant on supply chains to manufacture their goods risk reputational harm if the working conditions in those factories are revealed to be dangerous, illegal, or otherwise problematic. While firms are increasingly relying on private-sector social auditors to assess factory conditions, little has been known about the accuracy of those assessments. We analyzed nearly 17,000 code-of-conduct audits conducted at nearly 6,000 suppliers around the world. We found that audits yield fewer violations when the audit team has been at that particular supplier before, when audit teams are less experienced or less trained, when audit teams are all male, and when the audits were paid for by the supplier instead of by the buyer. We describe implications for firms relying on social auditors and for auditing firms. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keyword:
monitoring
transaction cost economics
auditing
supply chains
corporate social responsibility
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Strategic Management Journal 封面图
Strategic Management Journal
IF:
7.2
论文数:
3.4K
被引数:
4.6W

机构

U
university of california san francisco
学者数:
5.3W
论文数: 4.0W
被引数: 67
H
Harvard University
学者数:
26.5W
论文数: 22.0W
被引数: 28.7W
University of California System 封面图
University of California System
学者数:
37.5W
论文数: 33.7W
被引数: 6.6K
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容