.png){kind=icon}
返回
Moralization and self-control strategy selection
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.3758/s13423-023-02257-7.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
To manage conflicts between temptation and commitment, people use self-control. The process model of self-control outlines different strategies for managing the onset and experience of temptation. However, little is known about the decision-making factors underlying strategy selection. Across three experiments (N = 317), we tested whether the moral valence of a commitment predicts how people advise attentional self-control strategies. In Experiments 1 and 2, people rated attentional focus strategies as significantly more effective for people tempted to break moral relative to immoral commitments, even when controlling for perceived temptation and trait self-control. Experiment 3 showed that as people perceived commitments to have more positive moral valence, they judged attentional focus strategies to be significantly more effective relative to attentional distraction strategies. Moreover, this effect was partly mediated by perceived differences in motivation. These results indicate that moralization informs decision-making processes related to self-control strategy selection.
Keyword:
Self-control
Strategy
Attention
Distraction
Moralization
期刊
P
IF:
3
论文数:
4.5K
被引数:
1.5W
机构
引用论文
分享收藏Individual differences in the early recognition of moral information in lexical processing: An event-related potential study.png)
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
OAAI
SCIENTIFIC REPORTSIF3.9
OAAI分享收藏The Importance of Planned Dose of Chemotherapy on Time: Do We Need to Change Our Clinical Practice?OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Identification and expression of the gene Yr2 for resistance to Puccinia striiformis in the wheat differential cultivars Heines Kolben, Heines Peko and Heines VII鉴定和表达抗Puccinia striiformis的小麦差异品种Heines Kolben、Heines Peko和Heines VII中的Yr2基因OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容