.png){kind=icon}
返回
Multi-reviewing pull-requests: An exploratory study on GitHub OSS projects
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.infsof.2019.07.004.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Context: GitHub has enabled developers to easily contribute their review comments on multiple pull-requests and switch their review focus between different pull-requests, Le., multi-reviewing. Reviewing multiple pull-requests simultaneously may enhance work efficiency. However, multi-reviewing also relies on developers' rationally allocating their focus, which may bring a different influence to the resolution of pull-requests. Objective: In this paper, we present an ongoing study of the impact of multi-reviewing on pull-request resolution in GitHub open source projects. Method: We collected and analyzed 1,836,280 pull-requests from 760 GitHub projects to explore how multi-reviewing affects the resolution of a pull-request. Results: We find that multi-reviewing is a common behavior in GitHub. However, more multi-reviewing behaviors tend to bring longer pull-request resolution latency. Conclusion: Multi-reviewing is a complex behavior of developers, and has an important impact on the efficiency of pull-request resolution. Our study motivates the need for more research on multi-reviewing.
Keyword:
Multi-reviewing
Pull-requests
GitHub
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.3
论文数:
3.8K
被引数:
7.7K
机构
.png){kind=icon}
