arrow
返回

Multi-task autoencoder based classification-regression model for patient-specific VMAT QA

delete2020-11-25
delete33
delete
OA
AI
L
Le Wang
J
Jiaqi Li
S
Shu-Ming Zhang
X
Xile Zhang
Q
Qilin Zhang
M
Maria F. Chan
R
Ruijie Yang *
隋婧 (Jing Sui) *
DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/abb31cdelete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to assure accurate treatment delivery is resource-intensive and time-consuming. Recently, machine learning has been increasingly investigated in PSQA results prediction. However, the classification performance of models at different criteria needs further improvement and clinical validation (CV), especially for predicting plans with low gamma passing rates (GPRs). In this study, we developed and validated a novel multi-task model called autoencoder based classification-regression (ACLR) for VMAT PSQA. The classification and regression were integrated into one model, both parts were trained alternatively while minimizing a defined loss function. The classification was used as an intermediate result to improve the regression accuracy. Different tasks of GPRs prediction and classification based on different criteria were trained simultaneously. Balanced sampling techniques were used to improve the prediction accuracy and classification sensitivity for the unbalanced VMAT plans. Fifty-four metrics were selected as inputs to describe the plan modulation-complexity and delivery-characteristics, while the outputs were PSQA GPRs. A total of 426 clinically delivered VMAT plans were used for technical validation (TV), and another 150 VMAT plans were used for CV to evaluate the generalization performance of the model. The ACLR performance was compared with the Poisson Lasso (PL) model and found significant improvement in prediction accuracy. In TV, the absolute prediction error (APE) of ACLR was 1.76%, 2.60%, and 4.66% at 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm, respectively; whereas the APE of PL was 2.10%, 3.04%, and 5.29% at 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm, respectively. No significant difference was found between CV and TV in prediction accuracy. ACLR model set with 3%/3 mm can achieve 100% sensitivity and 83% specificity. The ACLR model could classify the unbalanced VMAT QA results accurately, and it can be readily applied in clinical practice for virtual VMAT QA.
Keyword:
VMAT QA
patient-specific QA
deep learning
radiotherapy

期刊

Physics in Medicine and Biology 封面图
Physics in Medicine and Biology
IF:
3.4
论文数:
1.4W
被引数:
3.1W

机构

I
institute of automation, cas
学者数:
2.2K
论文数: 2.1K
被引数: 2
C
chinese academy of sciences
学者数:
56.7W
论文数: 45.0W
被引数: 704
引用论文

引用论文

Examination of the properties of IMRT and VMAT beams and evaluation against pre-treatment quality assurance results
err2015-03-12
err63
errOAAI
errCrowe, S. B.; Kairn, T.; Middlebrook, N.; Sutherland, B.; Hill, B.; Kenny, J.; Langton, C. M.; Trapp, J. V.
err分享
err收藏
Impact of plan parameters on the dosimetric accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy
err2013-06-18
err225
PREAI
errMasi, Laura; Doro, Raffaela; Favuzza, Virginia; Cipressi, Samantha; Livi, Lorenzo
err分享
err收藏
Modulation indices for volumetric modulated arc therapy
err2014-11-10
err90
PREAI
errPark, Jong Min; Park, So-Yeon; Kim, Hyoungnyoun; Kim, Jin Ho; Carlson, Joel; Ye, Sung-Joon
err分享
err收藏
Prediction of dosimetric accuracy for VMAT plans using plan complexity parameters via machine learning通过机器学习使用计划复杂性参数预测VMAT计划的剂量测定精度
err2019-07-09
err59
PREAI
errOno, Tomohiro; Hirashima, Hideaki; Iramina, Hiraku; Mukumoto, Nobutaka; Miyabe, Yuki; Nakamura, Mitsuhiro; Mizowaki, Takashi
err分享
err收藏
A mathematical framework for virtual IMRT QA using machine learning使用机器学习的虚拟IMRT QA数学框架
err2016-06-20
err156
PREAI
errValdes, G.; Scheuermann, R.; Hung, C. Y.; Olszanski, A.; Bellerive, M.; Solberg, T. D.
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容