arrow
返回

Multiple instance classification: Review, taxonomy and comparative study

delete2013-08-01
delete477
delete
OA
AI
A
Amores, Jaume *
DOI:10.1016/j.artint.2013.06.003delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) has become an important topic in the pattern recognition community, and many solutions to this problem have been proposed until now. Despite this fact, there is a lack of comparative studies that shed light into the characteristics and behavior of the different methods. In this work we provide such an analysis focused on the classification task (i.e., leaving out other learning tasks such as regression). In order to perform our study, we implemented fourteen methods grouped into three different families. We analyze the performance of the approaches across a variety of well-known databases, and we also study their behavior in synthetic scenarios in order to highlight their characteristics. As a result of this analysis, we conclude that methods that extract global bag-level information show a clearly superior performance in general. In this sense, the analysis permits us to understand why some types of methods are more successful than others, and it permits us to establish guidelines in the design of new MIL methods. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Multi-instance learning
Codebook
Bag-of-Words
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Artificial Intelligence Review 封面图
Artificial Intelligence Review
IF:
13.9
论文数:
6.1K
被引数:
1.9W

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
Greedy Sampling of Graph Signals
err2018-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errLuiz F. O. Chamon; Alejandro Ribeiro
err分享
err收藏
Bose-Einstein Condensation into Nonequilibrium States Studied by Condensate Focusing
err2002-12-20
err0
errOAAI
errI. Shvarchuck; Ch. Buggle; D. S. Petrov; K. Dieckmann; M. Zielonkowski; M. Kemmann; T. G. Tiecke; W. von Klitzing; G. V. Shlyapnikov; J. T. M. Walraven
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容