返回
Multiple trend breaks and the unit-root hypothesis
DOI:10.1162/003465397556791.png)
摘要
En 中文
Ever since Nelson and Plosser (1982) found evidence in favor of the unit-root hypothesis for 13 long-term annual macro series, observed unit-root behavior has been equated with persistence in the economy. Perron (1989) questioned this interpretation, arguing instead that the ''observed'' behavior may indicate failure to account for structural change. Zivot and Andrews (1992) restored confidence in the unit-root hypothesis by incorporating an endogenous break point into the specification. By allowing for the possibility of two endogenous break points, we find more evidence against the unit-root hypothesis than Zivot and Andrews, but less than Perron.
Keyword:
TIME-SERIES
MODELS
TESTS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.8
论文数:
3.6K
被引数:
2.1W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
TRENDS AND RANDOM-WALKS IN MACROECONOMIC TIME-SERIES - SOME EVIDENCE AND IMPLICATIONS宏观经济时间序列中的趋势和随机游走 -- 一些证据和启示
没有更多内容

