1
Return

No clear benefit of patient-specific instruments over conventional instrumentation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A secondary analysis of a multicentre randomised trial with 5-year follow-up

delete2026-08-11
delete0
PRE
AI
A
Alexandra M Leenders *
M
Martijn Gerhardus Maria Schotanus
J
Jasper Most
R
Rutger Coen Ivo Van Geenen
B
Bert Boonen
DOI：10.1002/ksa.70515delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The objective of the secondary analysis of this randomised controlled trial, conducted at two medical centres, was to compare the revision-free survivorship and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of patient-specific instruments (PSI) versus conventional instrumentation (CI) used in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) over a mid-term follow-up period of at least 5-years. The hypothesis was that both groups would show similar outcomes.
Keywords:
conventional instrumentation
patient specific instruments
prosthesis survival
randomised controlled trial
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Journal

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy cover
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
IF:
5
Papers:
9.0K
Citations:
2.5W

Organization

Z
zuyderland medical center
Scholars:
881
Papers: 612
Citations: 1
A
amphia medical center
Scholars:
2
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers