.png){kind=icon}
返回
Nonstandard Errors
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1111/jofi.13337.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
In statistics, samples are drawn from a population in a data-generating process (DGP). Standard errors measure the uncertainty in estimates of population parameters. In science, evidence is generated to test hypotheses in an evidence-generating process (EGP). We claim that EGP variation across researchers adds uncertainty-nonstandard errors (NSEs). We study NSEs by letting 164 teams test the same hypotheses on the same data. NSEs turn out to be sizable, but smaller for more reproducible or higher rated research. Adding peer-review stages reduces NSEs. We further find that this type of uncertainty is underestimated by participants.
Keyword:
CROSS-SECTION
ANALYSTS
RISK
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
9.5
论文数:
4.2K
被引数:
5.0W
机构
查看更多机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results许多分析师，一个数据集: 透明分析选择的变化如何影响结果OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容