arrow
返回

Numerical methods for computing angles between linear subspaces

delete1973-01-01
delete0
delete
OA
AI
DOI:10.1090/s0025-5718-1973-0348991-3delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文

Assume that two subspaces F and G of a unitary space are defined as the ranges (or null spaces) of given rectangular matrices A and B. Accurate numerical methods are developed for computing the principal angles θ k ( F , G ) {\theta _k}(F,G) and orthogonal sets of principal vectors u k ∈ F {u_k} \in F and v k ∈ G , k = 1 , 2 , ⋯ , q = dim ⁡ ( G ) ≦ dim ⁡ ( F ) {v_k} \in G,k = 1,2, \cdots ,q = \dim (G) \leqq \dim (F) . An important application in statistics is computing the canonical correlations σ k = cos ⁡ θ k {\sigma _k} = \cos {\theta _k} between two sets of variates. A perturbation analysis shows that the condition number for θ k {\theta _k} essentially is max ( κ ( A ) , κ ( B ) ) \max (\kappa (A),\kappa (B)) , where κ \kappa denotes the condition number of a matrix. The algorithms are based on a preliminary QR-factorization of A and B (or A H {A^H} and B H {B^H} ), for which either the method of Householder transformations (HT) or the modified Gram-Schmidt method (MGS) is used. Then cos θ k \cos \;{\theta _k} and sin θ k \sin \;{\theta _k} are computed as the singular values of certain related matrices. Experimental results are given, which indicates that MGS gives θ k {\theta _k} with equal precision and fewer arithmetic operations than HT. However, HT gives principal vectors, which are orthogonal to working accuracy, which is not generally true for MGS. Finally, the case when A and/or B are rank deficient is discussed.

AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

暂无期刊信息

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息