1
Return

Observational Data for Next-Generation Climate Model Evaluation: Requirements, Considerations, and Best Practices

delete2026-04-01
delete0
PRE
AI
S
Swaminathan, Ranjini
B
Beucher, Romain *
E
Ed Blockley
B
Brands, Swen
B
Birgit Hassler
D
Dóra Hegedűs
F
Forrest M. Hoffman
J
Jiwoo Lee
J
Jared Lewis
J
Jianhua Lu
E
Elizaveta E. Malinina
B
Brian Medeiros
S
Scoccimarro, Enrico
J
Jerry Tjiputra
B
Briony Turner
D
Duncan Watson-Parris
DOI:10.1175/BAMS-D-25-0079.1delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Climate model simulations are an important source of information about our planet's climate system and also enable informed decision-making under different future scenarios. As a new archive of results from the next generation of climate models is anticipated to become available with the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 7 (CMIP7), the need to develop efficient and robust methods to evaluate models is paramount. Observations are an integral part of model evaluation, providing a means to quantify and understand the degree to which climate models can faithfully reproduce Earth system processes. Such analysis is critical for constraining climate projections, identifying areas of focus for model development, and assisting analysts in deciphering the utility of models for specific applications. Observations of Earth system come from a diversity of sources, span different space-time domains, and are produced by different communities, and each dataset features different data structures and formats, metadata standards, and its own unique uncertainties. Uncertainties in an observational dataset may stem from gaps in temporal and spatial coverage, instrumentation errors, or assumptions in retrieval and processing methods. How then does one ensure that observational data are ready for use and utilized in the most appropriate way for robust, rapid, and routine climate model evaluation? The CMIP7 Model Benchmarking Task Team with input from the broader climate modeling, model evaluation, and observational data communities present a vision and considerations for best practices toward the optimal and appropriate use of observational data to support next-generation climate model evaluation. Significance Statement: Computer models that simulate Earth system, known as climate models, are important tools for understanding how climate processes work and provide estimates of the climate system in the past and the future. Policy decisions regarding how to adapt to and limit the impact of climate change rely on these models, and it is, therefore, important to know how well they capture the real world. Real-world observations play an important role in understanding how well climate models represent Earth's climate system. We describe various aspects of using observations for model evaluation and suggest best practices to make this process more efficient, accurate, and inclusive of a wider number of observed phenomena. Considerations and best practices are presented for the use of observations in climate model evaluation. The discussion centers on practices to support next-generation evaluation for Coupled Model Intercomparison Project simulations.
Keywords:
Climate records
Satellite observations
Surface observations
Climate models
Diagnostics
Model evaluation/ performance

Journal

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society cover
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
IF:
5.9
Papers:
3.7K
Citations:
2.7W

Organization

N
nerc national centre for earth observation
Scholars:
141
Papers: 101
Citations: 0
H
helmholtz association
Scholars:
5.6K
Papers: 2.1K
Citations: 6
H
hadley centre
Scholars:
1.1K
Papers: 940
Citations: 0
N
natural environment research council (nerc)
Scholars:
4.3K
Papers: 3.5K
Citations: 4
S
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Scholars:
3.3K
Papers: 2.1K
Citations: 11
T
Temple University
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 8.7K
Citations: 1.9W
M
met office - uk
Scholars:
3.1K
Papers: 3.0K
Citations: 1
C
U
uk research & innovation (ukri)
Scholars:
2.7W
Papers: 2.3W
Citations: 32
S
science & technology facilities council (stfc)
Scholars:
4.6K
Papers: 3.3K
Citations: 8
U
united states department of energy (doe)
Scholars:
11.2W
Papers: 9.6W
Citations: 246
P
pennsylvania commonwealth system of higher education (pcshe)
Scholars:
12.8W
Papers: 11.7W
Citations: 177
U
universidad de cantabria
Scholars:
542
Papers: 276
Citations: 0
C
csic - instituto de fisica de cantabria (ifca)
Scholars:
1.3K
Papers: 1.1K
Citations: 5
E
european space agency
Scholars:
396
Papers: 225
Citations: 0
U
University of Reading
Scholars:
9.9K
Papers: 1.1W
Citations: 1.7W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers