返回
On optimal rerandomization designs
DOI:10.1111/rssb.12417.png)
摘要
En 中文
Blocking is commonly used in randomized experiments to increase efficiency of estimation. A generalization of blocking removes allocations with imbalance in covariate distributions between treated and control units, and then randomizes within the remaining set of allocations with balance. This idea of rerandomization was formalized by Morgan and Rubin (Annals of Statistics, 2012, 40, 1263-1282), who suggested using Mahalanobis distance between treated and control covariate means as the criterion for removing unbalanced allocations. Kallus (Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2018, 80, 85-112) proposed reducing the set of balanced allocations to the minimum. Here we discuss the implication of such an 'optimal' rerandomization design for inferences to the units in the sample and to the population from which the units in the sample were randomly drawn. We argue that, in general, it is a bad idea to seek the optimal design for an inference because that inference typically only reflects uncertainty from the random sampling of units, which is usually hypothetical, and not the randomization of units to treatment versus control.
Keyword:
causal inference
exact inference
Mahalanobis distance
optimal design
rerandomization
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
J
IF:
3.6
论文数:
1.5K
被引数:
3.2W
机构
引用论文
Evaluation of adherence to Mediterranean diet in medical students at Kocaeli University对Kocaeli大学医学学生地中海饮食依从性的评估
RERANDOMIZATION TO IMPROVE COVARIATE BALANCE IN EXPERIMENTS重新随机化以改善实验中的协变量平衡
ANNALS OF STATISTICS
IF3.7
没有更多内容

