arrow
Return

OPTIMAL POLICY EVALUATION USING KERNEL-BASED TEMPORAL DIFFERENCE METHODS

delete2024-10-01
delete0
PRE
AI
Y
Yaqi Duan *
M
Mengdi Wang
M
Martin J. Wainwright
DOI:10.1214/24-AOS2399delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
We study nonparametric methods for estimating the value function of an infinite-horizon discounted Markov reward process (MRP). We analyze the kernel-based least-squares temporal difference (LSTD) estimate, which can be understood either as a nonparametric instrumental variables method, or as a projected approximation to the Bellman fixed point equation. Our analysis imposes no assumptions on the transition operator of the Markov chain, but rather only conditions on the reward function and population-level kernel LSTD solutions. Using empirical process theory and concentration inequalities, we establish a nonasymptotic upper bound on the error with explicit dependence on the effective horizon H = ( 1 - gamma ) - 1 of the Markov reward process, the eigenvalues of the associated kernel operator, as well as the instance-dependent variance of the Bellman residual error. In addition, we prove minimax lower bounds over subclasses of MRPs, which shows that our guarantees are optimal in terms of the sample size n and the effective horizon H . Whereas existing worst-case theory predicts cubic scaling (H3) in the effective horizon, our theory reveals a much wider range of scalings, depending on the kernel, the stationary distribution, and the variance of the Bellman residual error. Notably, it is only parametric and near-parametric problems that can ever achieve the worst-case cubic scaling.
Keywords:
Sequential decision-making
dynamic programming
reinforcement learning
Markov reward process
nonparametric estimation
policy evaluation
temporal difference learning
reproducing kernel Hilbert space

Journal

Annals of Statistics cover
Annals of Statistics
IF:
3.7
Papers:
2.8K
Citations:
2.9W

Organization

P
Princeton University
Scholars:
2.1W
Papers: 2.3W
Citations: 5.1W
N
New York University
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 3.9W
Citations: 5.8W