arrow
返回

Optimal sediment transport for morphodynamic model validation

delete2020-06-01
delete9
delete
OA
AI
J
J. Bosboom *
M
Michael J. Mol
A
Ad Reniers
M
M.J.F. Stive
C
C.F. de Valk
DOI:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103662delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Although commonly used for the validation of morphological predictions, point-wise accuracy metrics, such as the root-mean-squared error (RMSE), are not well suited to demonstrate the quality of a high-variability prediction; in the presence of (often inevitable) location errors, the comparison of depth values per grid point tends to favour predictions that underestimate variability. In order to overcome this limitation, this paper presents a novel diagnostic tool that defines the distance between predicted and observed morphological fields in terms of an optimal sediment transport field, which moves the misplaced sediment from the predicted to the observed morphology. This optimal corrective transport field has the cheapest quadratic transportation cost and is relatively easily found through a parameter-free and symmetric solution procedure solving an elliptic partial differential equation. Our method, which we named effective transport difference (ETD), is a variation to a partial differential equation approach to the Monge-Kantorovich L-2 optimal transport problem. As a new error metric, we propose the root-mean-squared transport error (RMSTE) as the root-mean-squared value of the optimal transport field. We illustrate the advantages of the RMSTE for simple 1D and 2D cases as well as for more realistic morphological fields, generated with Delft3D, for an idealized case of a tidal inlet developing from an initially highly schematized geometry. The results show that by accounting for the spatial structure of morphological fields, the RMSTE, as opposed to the RMSE, is able to discriminate between predictions that differ in the misplacement distance of predicted morphological features, and avoids the consistent favouring of the underprediction of morphological variability that the RMSE is prone to.
Keyword:
Root-mean-squared error
Model accuracy
Morphodynamic modelling
Model validation
Optimal transport
Monge-Kantorovich
Root-mean-squared transport error
Effective transport difference
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Coastal Engineering 封面图
Coastal Engineering
IF:
4.5
论文数:
3.2K
被引数:
1.2W

机构

D
Delft University of Technology
学者数:
2.6W
论文数: 2.5W
被引数: 3.8W
R
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute
学者数:
1.3K
论文数: 1.3K
被引数: 2.7K
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
Two-dimensional time dependent hurricane overwash and erosion modeling at Santa Rosa Island
err2010-07-01
err291
PREAI
errMcCall, R. T.; de Vries, J. S. M. Van Thiel; Plant, N. G.; Van Dongeren, A. R.; Roelvink, J. A.; Thompson, D. M.; Reniers, A. J. H. M.
err分享
err收藏
Tips and traps in neurological imaging: Imaging the perimedullary spaces
err2012-12-01
err0
errOAAI
errJ.-L. Dietemann; A. Bogorin; M. Abu Eid; R. Sanda; I. Mourao Soares; S. Draghici; N. Rotaru; M. Koob
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Megacusps on rip channel bathymetry: Observations and modeling
err2011-09-01
err44
PREAI
errOrzech, Mark D.; Reniers, Ad J. H. M.; Thornton, Edward B.; MacMahan, Jamie H.
err分享
err收藏
Modelling the morphodynamics of gravel beaches during storms with XBeach-G
err2015-09-01
err82
errOAAI
errMcCall, R. T.; Masselink, G.; Poate, T. G.; Roelvink, J. A.; Almeida, L. P.
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容