1
Return

Optimizing the Accuracy of Natural Language Processing Tools for Pulmonary Embolism Detection Through Integration with Claims Data: The PE-EHR plus Study

delete2026-02-01
delete0
PRE
AI
S
Sina Rashedi
S
Syed Bukhari
D
Darsiya Krishnathasan
C
Candrika D Khairani
A
Antoine Bejjani
M
Mariana Pfeferman
J
Julia Malejczyk
M
Mehrdad Zarghami
E
Eric A. Secemsky
F
Farbod N. Rahaghi
H
Hussain, Mohamad A.
H
Hamid Mojibian
G
Goldhaber, Samuel Z.
D
David Jiménez
M
Manuel Monreal
R
Richard Yang
L
Li Zhou
G
Gregory Piazza
H
Harlan Krumholz
L
Liqin Wang
B
Bikdeli, Behnood *
DOI:10.1055/a-2796-1975delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Background Rule-based natural language processing (NLP) tools can identify pulmonary embolism (PE) via radiology reports. However, their external validity remains uncertain. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 1,712 hospitalized patients (with and without PE) at Mass General Brigham (MGB) hospitals (2016-2021) were analyzed. Two previously published NLP algorithms were applied to radiology reports to identify PE. Chart review by two physicians was the reference standard. We tested three approaches: (A) NLP applied to all patients; (B) NLP limited to radiology reports of patients with principal or secondary International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD-10) PE discharge codes; and (C) NLP applied to patients with PE discharge codes or a Present-on-Admission (POA) indicator (Y) for PE. All others were assumed PE-negative in Approaches B and C to minimize NLP false positives. Weighted estimates were derived from the MGB hospitalized cohort (n 1/4 381,642) to calculate F1 scores (as the harmonic mean of sensitivity and positive predictive value [PPV]). Results In Approach A, both NLP tools showed high sensitivity (82.5%, 93.0%) and specificity (98.9%, 98.7%) but low PPV (60.3%, 59.6%). Approach B improved PPV (95.2%, 94.9%) but reduced sensitivity (74.1%, 76.2%), while Approach C preserved both high sensitivity (82.5%, 93.0%) and PPV (95.6%, 95.8%). Approach C demonstrated the best performance, yielding significantly higher F1 scores for both NLP tools (88.6%, 94.4%) compared with Approach A (69.7%, 72.6%) and Approach B (83.3%, 84.5%) (P < 0.001). Conclusion The accuracy of PE detection improves when rule-based NLP algorithms are operationalized using administrative claims data in addition to radiology reports.
Keywords:
pulmonary embolism
natural language processing
international classification of diseases
electronic health record
accuracy

Journal

Thrombosis and Haemostasis cover
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
IF:
4.3
Papers:
7.0K
Citations:
1.4W

Organization

H
Harvard University
Scholars:
26.2W
Papers: 21.9W
Citations: 28.7W
H
harvard university medical affiliates
Scholars:
5.7W
Papers: 4.5W
Citations: 36
H
harvard medical school
Scholars:
4.6K
Papers: 2.1K
Citations: 2
 
 johns hopkins university
Scholars:
3.9K
Papers: 1.5K
Citations: 0
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers