.png){kind=icon}
返回
OWL-based reasoning methods for validating archetypes
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jbi.2012.11.009.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Some modern Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) architectures and standards are based on the dual model-based architecture, which defines two conceptual levels: reference model and archetype model. Such architectures represent ERR domain knowledge by means of archetypes, which are considered by many researchers to play a fundamental role for the achievement of semantic interoperability in healthcare. Consequently, formal methods for validating archetypes are necessary. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in exploring how semantic web technologies in general, and ontologies in particular, can facilitate the representation and management of archetypes, including binding to terminologies, but no solution based on such technologies has been provided to date to validate archetypes. Our approach represents archetypes by means of OWL ontologies. This permits to combine the two levels of the dual model-based architecture in one modeling framework which can also integrate terminologies available in OWL format. The validation method consists of reasoning on those ontologies to find modeling errors in archetypes: incorrect restrictions over the reference model, non-conformant archetype specializations and inconsistent terminological bindings. The archetypes available in the repositories supported by the openEHR Foundation and the NHS Connecting for Health Program, which are the two largest publicly available ones, have been analyzed with our validation method. For such purpose, we have implemented a software tool called Archeck. Our results show that around 1/5 of archetype specializations contain modeling errors, the most common mistakes being related to coded terms and terminological bindings. The analysis of each repository reveals that different patterns of errors are found in both repositories. This result reinforces the need for making serious efforts in improving archetype design processes. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Electronic healthcare records
Archetypes
Ontologies
OWL
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.5
论文数:
3.5K
被引数:
1.9W
机构
引用论文
The Conceptualisation and Measurement of DSM-5 Internet Gaming Disorder: The Development of the IGD-20 Test.png)
PLoS ONEOAAI
PLoS ONEIF0
OAAI分享收藏LinkEHR-Ed: A multi-reference model archetype editor based on formal semanticsLinkehr-ed: 一种基于形式语义的多参考模型原型编辑器OAAI
OAAI分享收藏1H-Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomic analysis of brain in mice with nicotine treatment
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容