.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Partial Evaluation Strategies for Expensive Evolutionary Constrained Optimization
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1109/TEVC.2021.3078486.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Constrained optimization problems (COPs) are frequently encountered in real-world design applications. For some COPs, the evaluation of the objective(s) and/or constraint(s) may involve significant computational/temporal/financial cost. Such problems are referred to as expensive COPs (ECOPs). Surrogate modeling has been widely used in conjunction with optimization methods for such problems, wherein the search is partially driven by an approximate function instead of true expensive evaluations. However, for any true evaluation, nearly all existing methods compute all objective and constraint values together as one batch. Such full evaluation approaches may be inefficient for cases where the objective/constraint(s) can be evaluated independently of each other. In this article, we propose and study a constraint handling strategy for ECOPs using partial evaluations. The constraints are evaluated in a sequence determined based on their likelihood of being violated; and the evaluation is aborted if a constraint violation is encountered. Modified ranking strategies are introduced to effectively rank the solutions using the limited information thus obtained, while saving on significant function evaluations. The proposed algorithm is compared with a number of its variants to establish the utility of its key components systematically. Numerical experiments and benchmarking are conducted on a range of mathematical and engineering design problems to demonstrate the efficacy of the approach compared to state-of-the-art evolutionary optimization approaches.
Keywords:
Optimization
Constraint handling
Computational modeling
Search problems
Tools
Safety
Automobiles
Constraint handling
selective evaluation
sequencing
surrogate-assisted optimization
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
12
Papers:
1.8K
Citations:
2.4W
Organization
No organization information available