返回
People systematically overlook subtractive changes
DOI:10.1038/s41586-021-03380-y.png)
摘要
En 中文
Improving objects, ideas or situations-whether a designer seeks to advance technology, a writer seeks to strengthen an argument or a manager seeks to encourage desired behaviour-requires a mental search for possible changes(1-3). We investigated whether people are as likely to consider changes that subtract components from an object, idea or situation as they are to consider changes that add new components. People typically consider a limited number of promising ideas in order to manage the cognitive burden of searching through all possible ideas, but this can lead them to accept adequate solutions without considering potentially superior alternatives(4-10). Here we show that people systematically default to searching for additive transformations, and consequently overlook subtractive transformations. Across eight experiments, participants were less likely to identify advantageous subtractive changes when the task did not (versus did) cue them to consider subtraction, when they had only one opportunity (versus several) to recognize the shortcomings of an additive search strategy or when they were under a higher (versus lower) cognitive load. Defaulting to searches for additive changes may be one reason that people struggle to mitigate overburdened schedules(11), institutional red tape(12) and damaging effects on the planet(13,14).
Keyword:
DECISION
JUDGMENT
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
48.5
论文数:
1.8W
被引数:
96.5W
机构
引用论文
High-modulus all-carbon ladder polymer of hydroquinone and formaldehyde that bridges the gap between single-strand polymers and graphene nanoribbons
RSC Adv.
IF0
Photophysical and Photocatalytic Properties of SrTiO3 Doped with Cr Cations on Different Sites不同位掺杂Cr阳离子的SrTiO3 的光物理和光催化性能

