.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Knee-Comparison of Different Treatment Algorithms
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
H
G
A
J
J
DOI：10.3390/jcm13133718.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty is a serious complication lacking evidence-based diagnostic and treatment protocols, particularly in ruling out persisting infection before reimplantation. Methods: This retrospective analysis assessed the mid-term outcomes of 66 patients undergoing septic two-stage knee revision surgeries from 2007 to 2013, diagnosed as per the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. After implant removal and antibiotic treatment, reimplantation decisions were based on either joint aspiration, blood counts, and clinical examination (group A) or an open biopsy (group B). Both groups underwent meticulous debridement and spacer exchange during the interim period. Results: Late re-infection occurred in 12.1% of all patients. In group A, 13.8% experienced late re-infection, with 14.3% in subgroup A1 and 13.3% in subgroup A2. In group B, 10% had a late re-infection. No significant difference in re-infection or complication rates was found between the groups. Conclusions: The study did not demonstrate the superiority of group B's approach of open biopsy over group A's joint aspiration, clinical examination, and blood counts in preventing re-infection or reducing complications.
Keywords:
periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)
total knee arthroplasty
joint aspiration
re-infection rate
revision surgery
Journal
IF:
2.9
Papers:
5.0W
Citations:
9.8W
Organization
Cited Papers