.png){kind=icon}
返回
Personality, intelligence and proof-reading
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.025.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Two studies sought to determine personality and cognitive ability correlates of proof-reading. In both studies candidates were given 5 min to identify up to 55 errors in a 920 word, two page document. In Study 1, which tested 240 school children, fluid intelligence (as measured by the Baddeley Reasoning Test) was the highest correlate of proof-reading (r =.30). Eleven percent of the variance in total attempted scores was accounted for by intelligence, Introversion and low Conscientiousness. In the second study 70 undergraduates completed the same proof-reading test along with two intelligence tests (Baddeley Reasoning Test; Wonderlic Personnel Test) and a more robust personality measure (NEO-FFI). Proof-reading was correlated with both intelligence tests (Baddeley r =.45; Wonderlic r =.40). More of the variance was accounted for in the total attempted-score of errors than for a correct errors-detected score. When the two intelligence and five personality trait scores were regressed on to the proof-reading test score over a quarter of the var2 iance (Adj R-2 =.28) was accounted for, but only the Baddeley test was a significant predictor (Beta =.39). (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Keyword:
personality
traits
fluid intelligence
crystallised intelligence
proof-reading
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
2.6
论文数:
1.5W
被引数:
3.6W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Effect of Surface Hydrophobicity on the Formation and Stability of Oxygen Nanobubbles.png)
ChemPhysChem
ChemPhysChemIF0
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容