arrow
Return

Personalizing label prediction for GitHub issues

delete2022-05-01
delete12
PRE
AI
J
Jun Wang
章晓芳 cover
章晓芳 (Xiaofang Zhang) *
L
Lin Chen
X
Xiaoyuan Xie
DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2022.106845delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Context: Automated label prediction tools can help developers manage and categorize issues on GitHub. However, different open-source projects use various forms of labels with the same meaning. Previous label prediction methods mainly solve the problem of the synonymous labels by manual preprocessing rules, but these preprocessing rules can only identify synonyms with the same prefix or suffix.Objective: These factors inspire us to propose a method to identify these synonymous labels automatically and recommend personalized labels for different open-source projects.Method: In this paper, we propose a Personalizing Label Prediction framework for Issues named PLPI. PLPI identifies labels with similar meanings by representing labels as semantic vectors and applying clustering methods. PLPI can predict personalized labels from the existing labels in the open-source project.Result: We conduct a comprehensive study to compare seven commonly adopted labeling models with our approach. The experimental results demonstrate the advantages of our approach. Finally, we show some representative examples and discuss the visualization results of synonyms clustering by dimension reduction. Conclusion: The experimental results show that our method PLPI can improve label prediction performance and provide personalized label recommendation results for different open-source projects.
Keywords:
Deep learning
Issue labeling
Data analysis
Language model

Journal

Information and Software Technology cover
Information and Software Technology
IF:
4.3
Papers:
3.7K
Citations:
7.7K

Organization

N
nanjing university
Scholars:
7.7W
Papers: 5.6W
Citations: 87
S
soochow university - china
Scholars:
5.2W
Papers: 3.6W
Citations: 82
W
wuhan university
Scholars:
8.0W
Papers: 5.8W
Citations: 70
researcher View more organizations