.png){kind=icon}
返回
Placing Collaborative Circles in Strategic Action Fields: Explaining Differences between Highly Creative Groups*
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1177/0735275117740400.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Collaborative circles theory explains how innovative small groups develop and win acceptance of their creative work but assumes a single type of circle and would benefit from considering how circles are affected by the strategic action fields in which they operate. We do so by synthesizing research on art, science, philosophy, and social movements to identify five field characteristics that influence circles and their creative potentials (i.e., attention space, consensus, social control, resources, and organizational and geographical contexts). We then use primary and secondary data on science circles (the Resilience Alliance and Phage Group), combined with previous research on circles and group creativity, to show how field-level differences explain systematic variations in the structure and dynamics of art and science circles. We close by arguing that there exists of a family of circles operating in different fields, formulating a refined definition of circles, and postulating four propositions informing future research.
Keyword:
collaborative circles
strategic action fields
creativity
small groups
collective action
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5
论文数:
554
被引数:
4.0K
机构
引用论文
Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance denatonium benzoate (approved as denathonium benzoate).png)
EFSA Journal
OAAI
EFSA JournalIF0
OAAI分享收藏
分享收藏Cytoskeletal-associated protein kinase and phosphatase activities from cerebral cortex of young rats青年大鼠大脑皮层中与细胞骨架相关的蛋白激酶和磷酸酶活性
PREAI
分享收藏Reducing the duration of broadband excitation pulses using optimal control with limited RF amplitude
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容