.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
People categorize themselves and others, creating ingroup and outgroup distinctions. In American politics, parties constitute the in-and outgroups, and party leaders hold sway in articulating party positions. A party leader's endorsement of a policy can be persuasive, inducing co-partisans to take the same position. In contrast, a party leader's endorsement may polarize opinion, inducing out-party identifiers to take a contrary position. Using survey experiments from the 2008 presidential election, I examine whether in- and out-party candidate cues-John McCain and Barack Obama-affected partisan opinion. The results indicate that in-party leader cues do not persuade but that out-party leader cues polarize. This finding holds in an experiment featuring President Bush in which his endorsement did not persuade Republicans but it polarized Democrats. Lastly, I compare the effect of party leader cues to party label cues. The results suggest that politicians, not parties, function as polarizing cues.
Keyword:
SOCIAL IDENTITY
POLARIZATION
INFORMATION
POLICY
PARTY
SELF
MESSENGER
MESSAGE
FRAMES
BIAS
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5.6
论文数:
2.7K
被引数:
1.6W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Closing the Gap: When Do Cues Eliminate Differences between Sophisticated and Unsophisticated Citizens?.png)
JOURNAL OF POLITICS.png)
JOURNAL OF POLITICSIF3.8
PREAI
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏Tunable Chemokine Production by Antigen Presenting Dendritic Cells in Response to Changes in Regulatory T Cell Frequency in Mouse Reactive Lymph NodesPLoS ONE
OAAI
PLoS ONEIF0
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容