返回
POLICY EVALUATION - INCORPORATING USERS VIEWS
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1995.tb00836.x.png)
摘要
En 中文
There is a growing recognition that obtaining feedback from users is a fundamental and integral part of measuring effectiveness and without such a perspective, policy evaluation will have limited legitimacy. There is still, however, widespread uncertainty about how best to carry this out or in what circumstances, given methodological and other constraints, such an approach is likely to be worthwhile. The aim of this article is not to rehearse in detail the merits and demerits of users as stakeholders, thereby providing a rationale for their inclusion in the evaluation process. This has been adequately covered elsewhere despite the subsequent paucity of empirical studies seeking to incorporate user perspectives. Rather, it is an attempt to suggest a set of co-requisites which would provide some guidance to would-be evaluators as to those conditions in which incorporation of user perspectives will be both methodologically sound and practically useful. In so doing, it suggests a referential rather than just an exclusively schematic approach to evaluation. It is hoped that the insights provided by the case studies described in the article will help those involved in evaluations to more quickly vet or validate desiderata in which inclusions of this stakeholder's group is desirable, expedient, permissible and authoritative.
Keyword:
COMMUNITY-CARE
SERVICES
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5.1
论文数:
2.6K
被引数:
5.8K
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
INTRODUCING NEW STAKEHOLDERS USER AND RESEARCHER INTERESTS IN EVALUATIVE RESEARCH - A DISCUSSION OF METHODS USED TO EVALUATE THE BIRMINGHAM-COMMUNITY-CARE-SPECIAL-ACTION-PROJECT
POLICY AND POLITICS
IF3.1
Room and low temperature luminescence properties of CaSO4:Dy,Tm codoped with Li常温和低温发光性质的研究:Li共掺杂的CaSO₄:Dy,Tm

