返回
Posterior Predictive Bayesian Phylogenetic Model Selection
DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syt068.png)
摘要
En 中文
We present two distinctly different posterior predictive approaches to Bayesian phylogenetic model selection and illustrate these methods using examples from green algal protein-coding cpDNA sequences and flowering plant rDNA sequences. The Gelfand-Ghosh (GG) approach allows dissection of an overall measure of model fit into components due to posterior predictive variance (GG(p)) and goodness-of-fit (GG(g)), which distinguishes this method from the posterior predictive P-value approach. The conditional predictive ordinate (CPO) method provides a site-specific measure of model fit useful for exploratory analyses and can be combined over sites yielding the log pseudomarginal likelihood (LPML) which is useful as an overall measure of model fit. CPO provides a useful cross-validation approach that is computationally efficient, requiring only a sample from the posterior distribution (no additional simulation is required). Both GG and CPO add new perspectives to Bayesian phylogenetic model selection based on the predictive abilities of models and complement the perspective provided by the marginal likelihood (including Bayes Factor comparisons) based solely on the fit of competing models to observed data. [Bayesian; conditional predictive ordinate; CPO; L-measure; LPML; model selection; phylogenetics; posterior predictive.].
Keyword:
Bayesian
conditional predictive ordinate
CPO
L-measure
LPML
model selection
phylogenetics
posterior predictive
期刊
IF:
5.7
论文数:
2.2K
被引数:
1.9W
机构
引用论文
A Method for Inferring the Rate of Evolution of Homologous Characters that Can Potentially Improve Phylogenetic Inference, Resolve Deep Divergence and Correct Systematic Biases
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY
IF5.7
Cryptic Failure of Partitioned Bayesian Phylogenetic Analyses: Lost in the Land of Long Trees
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY
IF5.7

