.png){kind=icon}
返回
Practical options for selecting data-driven or physics-based prognostics algorithms with reviews
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.ress.2014.09.014.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This paper is to provide practical options for prognostics so that beginners can select appropriate methods for their fields of application. To achieve this goal, several popular algorithms are first reviewed in the data-driven and physics-based prognostics methods. Each algorithm's attributes and pros and cons are analyzed in terms of model definition, model parameter estimation and ability to handle noise and bias in data. Fatigue crack growth examples are then used to illustrate the characteristics of different algorithms. In order to suggest a suitable algorithm, several studies are made based on the number of data sets, the level of noise and bias, availability of loading and physical models, and complexity of the damage growth behavior. Based on the study, it is concluded that the Gaussian process is easy and fast to implement, but works well only when the covariance function is properly defined. The neural network has the advantage in the case of large noise and complex models but only with many training data sets. The particle filter and Bayesian method are superior to the former methods because they are less affected by noise and model complexity, but work only when physical model and loading conditions are available. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Data-driven prognostics
Physics-based prognostics
Neural network
Gaussian process regression
Particle filter
Bayesian inference
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
R
IF:
11
论文数:
9.0K
被引数:
4.2W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance实施状态维修的机械诊断和预测综述
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容