arrow
Return

Predicting prostate cancer grade reclassification on active surveillance using a deep learning-based grading algorithm

delete2024-06-18
delete2
PRE
AI
C
Chien‐Kuang Cornelia Ding
Z
Zhuo T. Su
E
Erik Erak
L
Lia De Paula Oliveira
D
Daniela C. Salles
Y
Yuezhou Jing
P
Pranab Samanta
S
Saikiran Bonthu
U
Uttara Joshi
C
Chaith Kondragunta
N
Nitin Singhal
A
Angelo M. De Marzo
B
Bruce J. Trock
C
Christian P. Pavlovich
C
Claire M. de la Calle
T
Tamara L. Lotan *
DOI:10.1093/jnci/djae139delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Deep learning (DL)-based algorithms to determine prostate cancer (PCa) Grade Group (GG) on biopsy slides have not been validated by comparison to clinical outcomes. We used a DL-based algorithm, AIRAProstate, to regrade initial prostate biopsies in 2 independent PCa active surveillance (AS) cohorts. In a cohort initially diagnosed with GG1 PCa using only systematic biopsies (n = 138), upgrading of the initial biopsy to >= GG2 by AIRAProstate was associated with rapid or extreme grade reclassification on AS (odds ratio = 3.3, P = .04), whereas upgrading of the initial biopsy by contemporary uropathologist reviews was not associated with this outcome. In a contemporary validation cohort that underwent prostate magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy (n = 169), upgrading of the initial biopsy (all contemporary GG1 by uropathologist grading) by AIRAProstate was associated with grade reclassification on AS (hazard ratio = 1.7, P = .03). These results demonstrate the utility of a DL-based grading algorithm in PCa risk stratification for AS.
Keywords:
PROGRAM

Journal

JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute cover
JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
IF:
7.2
Papers:
6.2K
Citations:
3.3W

Organization

U
university of california san francisco
Scholars:
5.2W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 67
J
Johns Hopkins University
Scholars:
10.2W
Papers: 8.8W
Citations: 13.0W