arrow
返回

Preregistering Qualitative Research: A Delphi Study

delete2020-12-09
delete66
delete
OA
AI
T
Tamarinde Haven *
T
Timothy M. Errington
K
Kristian Skrede Gleditsch
L
Leonie van Grootel
A
Alan M. Jacobs
F
Florian G. Kern
R
Rafael Piñeiro Rodríguez
F
Fernando Rosenblatt
L
Lidwine B. Mokkink
DOI:10.1177/1609406920976417delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Preregistrations-records made a priori about study designs and analysis plans and placed in open repositories-are thought to strengthen the credibility and transparency of research. Different authors have put forth arguments in favor of introducing this practice in qualitative research and made suggestions for what to include in a qualitative preregistration form. The goal of this study was to gauge and understand what parts of preregistration templates qualitative researchers would find helpful and informative. We used an online Delphi study design consisting of two rounds with feedback reports in between. In total, 48 researchers participated (response rate: 16%). In round 1, panelists considered 14 proposed items relevant to include in the preregistration form, but two items had relevance scores just below our predefined criterion (68%) with mixed argument and were put forth again. We combined items where possible, leading to 11 revised items. In round 2, panelists agreed on including the two remaining items. Panelists also converged on suggested terminology and elaborations, except for two terms for which they provided clear arguments. The result is an agreement-based form for the preregistration of qualitative studies that consists of 13 items. The form will be made available as a registration option on Open Science Framework (osf.io). We believe it is important to assure that the strength of qualitative research, which is its flexibility to adapt, adjust and respond, is not lost in preregistration. The preregistration should provide a systematic starting point.
Keyword:
qualitative research
preregistration
transparency
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

I
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
IF:
3.8
论文数:
2.2K
被引数:
1.2W

机构

V
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
学者数:
4.2W
论文数: 3.7W
被引数: 3.7W
U
university of amsterdam
学者数:
6.0W
论文数: 5.1W
被引数: 94
U
University of Essex
学者数:
4.0K
论文数: 4.8K
被引数: 5
P
peace research institute oslo (prio)
学者数:
138
论文数: 155
被引数: 0
U
university diego portales
学者数:
1.5K
论文数: 1.5K
被引数: 23
U
universidad catolica del uruguay
学者数:
233
论文数: 190
被引数: 0
U
University of British Columbia
学者数:
7.0W
论文数: 6.1W
被引数: 8.6W
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research减少生物医学研究报告不完整或不可用造成的浪费
errLANCET
IF88.5
err2014-01-01
err888
PREAI
errGlasziou, Paul; Altman, Douglas G.; Bossuyt, Patrick; Boutron, Isabelle; Clarke, Mike; Julious, Steven; Michie, Susan; Moher, David; Wager, Elizabeth
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
A reflective display based on the electro-microfluidic assembly of particles within suppressed water-in-oil droplet array
err2023-12-05
err0
errOAAI
errShitao Shen; Haoqiang Feng; Yueming Deng; Shuting Xie; Zichuan Yi; Mingliang Jin; Guofu Zhou; Paul Mulvaney; Lingling Shui
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Optimising experimental research in respiratory diseases: an ERS statement
err2018-05-17
err80
errOAAI
errBonniaud, Philippe; Fabre, Aurelie; Frossard, Nelly; Guignabert, Christophe; Inman, Mark; Kuebler, Wolfgang M.; Maes, Tania; Shi, Wei; Stampfli, Martin; Uhlig, Stefan; White, Eric; Witzenrath, Martin; Bellaye, Pierre-Simon; Crestani, Bruno; Eickelberg, Oliver; Fehrenbach, Heinz; Guenther, Andreas; Jenkins, Gisli; Joos, Guy; Magnan, Antoine; Maitre, Bernard; Maus, Ulrich A.; Reinhold, Petra; Vernooy, Juanita H. J.; Richeldi, Luca; Kolb, Martin
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容