返回
Prices vs. quantities for self-enforcing agreements
DOI:10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102595.png)
摘要
En 中文
We study the optimal self-enforcing agreement based on quantity mandates and price instruments in a repeated game between countries, whose domestic firms invest in green technology before consumers emit. We find that technology must be regulated in addition to emissions, even in the absence of technological spillovers. Under a quantity agreement, emission is capped and countries must either overinvest in technology-to weaken the temptation to emit-or they must be punished unless they invest less-to maintain their willingness to retaliate on others. Under a price agreement, emission is taxed and investments subsidized. The price agreement dominates the quantity agreement because when firms are free to modify investment levels if another government defects, the punishment for defection is stronger.
Keyword:
Climate change
Prices vs. quantities
Repeated games
Self-enforcing agreements
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5.9
论文数:
2.6K
被引数:
1.2W
机构
引用论文
The role of the central nervous system in the generation and maintenance of chronic pain in rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia中枢神经系统在类风湿关节炎,骨关节炎和纤维肌痛的慢性疼痛的产生和维持中的作用

