arrow
返回

Prioritizing collaborative scheduling practices based on their impact on project performance

delete2022-03-14
delete12
PRE
AI
C
Chuanni He
刘敏 封面图
刘敏 (Min Liu) *
T
Thaís da C. L. Alves
N
Natalie M. Scala
S
Simon M. Hsiang
DOI:10.1080/01446193.2022.2048042delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Collaborative scheduling (CS) and related practices impact the performance of construction projects which can be measured by key performance indicators (KPIs). However, little is known about which of these practices are implemented and how their combined implementation might impact KPIs. The objectives of this research are to identify perceptions of CS practices that drive project performance, define CS practices used by industry that impact KPIs, and establish practices that are more commonly implemented and have a higher potential to positively impact KPIs. The research team conducted a nationwide survey in the United States and obtained 241 usable responses. Utilizing an information theory approach to measure the uncertainty of implementation and impact of each practice, the research built a set of Chow-Liu tree models to determine the most efficient sequence of actions to improve CS. Results indicate that meeting owners' expectation throughout the life-cycle of the project from design through construction and commissioning, using the schedule to support a strong project culture, and an effective communication plan were the top CS levers for overall KPI improvement. An innovative method was developed to help construction project managers discover the value of each CS practice, the relation between CS practices, and CS practices' influence to project KPIs so that managers can improve KPIs efficiently by prioritizing their CS practices according to their own project needs.
Keyword:
Collaborative scheduling
information theory
survey
practice
uncertainty

期刊

Construction Management and Economics 封面图
Construction Management and Economics
IF:
3.3
论文数:
385
被引数:
4.6K

机构

California State University System 封面图
California State University System
学者数:
2.8W
论文数: 2.4W
被引数: 457
University System of Maryland 封面图
University System of Maryland
学者数:
6.5W
论文数: 5.6W
被引数: 113
S
Syracuse University
学者数:
5.4K
论文数: 5.2K
被引数: 8.3K
S
San Diego State University
学者数:
4.7K
论文数: 3.8K
被引数: 1.0W
N
North Carolina State University
学者数:
2.6W
论文数: 2.3W
被引数: 3.7W
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

Construction Engineering-Reinvigorating the Discipline
err2011-10-01
err31
PREAI
errHowell, Gregory A.; Ballard, Glenn; Tommelein, Iris
err分享
err收藏
Survey Comparing Critical Path Method, Last Planner System, and Location-Based Techniques
err2019-12-01
err40
PREAI
errOlivieri, Hylton; Seppanen, Olli; Alves, Thais da C. L.; Scala, Natalie M.; Schiavone, Vincent; Liu, Min; Granja, Ariovaldo Denis
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Advanced Metrics for Construction Planning
err2019-11-01
err32
PREAI
errHamzeh, Farook R.; El Samad, Ghali; Emdanat, Samir
err分享
err收藏
The relationship between the last planner® system and collaborative planning practice in UK construction
err2017-05-15
err47
errOAAI
errDaniel, Emmanuel Itodo; Pasquire, Christine; Dickens, Graham; Ballard, Herman Glenn
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容