返回
摘要
En 中文
Only in the past decade has prisoner reentry been discovered and become a central policy concern in the United States. This is due in part to the sheer number of released inmates (more than 600,000 annually) and in part to a movement that has defined the issue as reentry. A growing number of programs have been created in prisons and the community. Implementing them effectively, however, poses substantial challenges. A wide diversity of programs fall wider the rubric and only a limited number of rigorous evaluations have been conducted. Research suggests that, overall, reentry services reduce recidivism, but program effects are heterogeneous and at times criminogenic. Effective programs tend to be consistent with the risk-needresponsivity model. A sustained effort to evaluate carefiilly designed programs rigorously is needed and may require development of a criminology of reentry. More needs to be understood about why recidivism rates are high in the first year after reentry, why some offenders have late -onset failure, whether who comes home matters, and how stigma and other collateral consequences of conviction can be managed.
Keyword:
TREATMENT SERVICES
OFFENDERS
DESISTANCE
REHABILITATION
REINTEGRATION
PROBATION
COMMUNITY
SCIENCE
PEOPLE
CRIME
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
暂无期刊信息

