返回
Probabilistic tree-based representation for solving minimum cost integer flow problems with nonlinear non-convex cost functions
DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105951.png)
摘要
En 中文
The minimum cost flow problem (MCFP) is the most generic variation of the network flow problem which aims to transfer a commodity throughout the network to satisfy demands. The problem size (in terms of the number of nodes and arcs) and the shape of the cost function are the most critical factors when considering MCFPs. Existing mathematical programming techniques often assume the cost functions to be linear or convex. Unfortunately, the linearity and convexity assumptions are too restrictive for modelling many real-world scenarios. In addition, many real-world MCFPs are large-scale, with networks having a large number of nodes and arcs. In this paper, we propose a probabilistic tree-based genetic algorithm (PTbGA) for solving large-scale minimum cost integer flow problems with nonlinear non-convex cost functions. We first compare this probabilistic tree-based representation scheme with the priority-based representation scheme, which is the most commonly-used representation for solving MCFPs. We then compare the performance of PTbGA with that of the priority-based genetic algorithm (PrGA), and two state-of-the-art mathematical solvers on a set of MCFP instances. Our experimental results demonstrate the superiority and efficiency of PTbGA in dealing with large-sized MCFPs, as compared to the PrGA method and the mathematical solvers. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Minimum cost flow problem
Genetic algorithm
Representation scheme
Mixed integer nonlinear programming
Taguchi experimental design
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.6
论文数:
1.4W
被引数:
4.8W
机构
引用论文
A deterministic annealing algorithm for the minimum concave cost network flow problem
NEURAL NETWORKS
IF6.3
Development of a checklist for people communicating evidence-based information about the effects of healthcare interventions: a mixed methods study
BMJ Open
IF0

