返回
Procedural Coordination in the Matching Task
DOI:10.1525/collabra.188.png)
摘要
En 中文
Participants in conversation who recurrently discuss the same targets require fewer and fewer words to identify them. This has been attributed to the collaborative elaboration of conceptual pacts, that is, semantic coordination. But participants do not only coordinate on the semantics of referring expressions; they also coordinate on how to do the task, that is, on procedural coordination. In a matching task experiment (n = 22 dyads), we examined the development of four aspects of procedural coordination: Card placement (CP), implicit generic coordination (IGC), explicit generic coordination (EGC) and general procedural coordination (GPC) in two conditions (the classic condition where targets remain the same over trials, and a new cards condition, where they change at each trial, thus increasing the difficulty of semantic coordination). Procedural coordination constituted almost 30% of the total amount of talk in the matching task. Procedural coordination was more effortful when semantic coordination was more difficult and the four aspects of procedural coordination developed differently depending on participant roles.
Keyword:
collaborative referring
dialogue
conversation
matching task
conceptual pact
procedural coordination
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.2
论文数:
616
被引数:
1.5K
机构
引用论文
Communication and collective action: language and the evolution of human cooperation沟通与集体行动: 语言与人类合作的演变
A critical review of current evidence on multiple types of discrimination and mental health.对当前关于多种类型歧视和精神卫生的证据进行严格审查。

