arrow
返回

Proposal for an objective binary benchmarking framework that validates each other for comparing MCDM methods through data analytics

delete2023-04-25
delete11
delete
OA
AI
M
Mahmut Baydaş
T
Tevfik Eren
Ž
Željko Stević *
V
Vitomir Starčević
R
Raif Parlakkaya
DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.1350delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
When it comes to choosing the best option among multiple alternatives with criteria of different importance, it makes sense to use multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methods with more than 200 variations. However, because the algorithms of MCDM methods are different, they do not always produce the same best option or the same hierarchical ranking. At this point, it is important how and according to which MCDM methods will be compared, and the lack of an objective evaluation framework still continues. The mathematical robustness of the computational procedures, which are the inputs of MCDM methods, is of course important. But their output dimensions, such as their capacity to generate well-established real-life relationships and rank reversal (RR) performance, must also be taken into account. In this study, we propose for the first time two criteria that confirm each other. For this purpose, the financial performance (FP) of 140 listed manufacturing companies was calculated using nine different MCDM methods integrated with step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). In the next stage, the statistical relationship between the MCDM-based FP final results and the simultaneous stock returns of the same companies in the stock market was compared. Finally, for the first time, the RR performance of MCDM methods was revealed with a statistical procedure proposed in this study. According to the findings obtained entirely through data analytics, Faire Un Choix Adequat (FUCA) and (which is a fairly new method) the compromise ranking of alternatives from distance to ideal solution (CRADIS) were determined as the most appropriate methods by the joint agreement of both criteria.
Keyword:
MCDM benchmarking and evaluation methodology
Data analytics
Rank reversal
Financial performance
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

PeerJ Computer Science 封面图
PeerJ Computer Science
IF:
2.5
论文数:
3.4K
被引数:
6.9K

机构

N
Necmettin Erbakan University
学者数:
1.9K
论文数: 1.8K
被引数: 1.5K
U
University of East Sarajevo
学者数:
412
论文数: 265
被引数: 203
引用论文

引用论文

Aristolochic acid I suppressed iNOS gene expression and NF-κB activation in stimulated macrophage cells
err2011-04-01
err0
PREAI
errMing-Chao Liu; Ting-Hui Lin; Ting-Shuan Wu; Feng-Yih Yu; Chuan-Chen Lu; Biing-Hui Liu
err分享
err收藏
err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
err分享
err收藏
Polar low climatology over the Nordic and Barents seas based on satellite passive microwave data
err2015-07-06
err0
errOAAI
errJulia E. Smirnova; Pavel A. Golubkin; Leonid P. Bobylev; Elizaveta V. Zabolotskikh; Bertrand Chapron
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容