.png){kind=icon}
返回
Purity is still a problem
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1017/S0140525X23000286.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Our recent review demonstrates that purity is a messy construct with at least nine popular scientific understandings. Cultural beliefs about self-control help unify some of these understandings, but much messiness remains. The harm-centric theory of dyadic morality suggests that purity violations can be comprehensively understood as abstract harms, acts perceived by some people (and not others) to indirectly cause suffering.
Keyword:
LIBERALS
期刊
IF:
13.7
论文数:
1.6W
被引数:
1.2W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
The Affective Harm Account (AHA) of Moral Judgment: Reconciling Cognition and Affect, Dyadic Morality and Disgust, Harm and Purity道德判断的情感伤害帐户 (AHA): 调和认知与情感，二元道德与厌恶，伤害与纯洁
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
The Myth of Harmless Wrongs in Moral Cognition: Automatic Dyadic Completion From Sin to Suffering
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm二元道德理论: 通过重新定义伤害来重塑道德判断
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏分享收藏 没有更多内容
没有更多内容