arrow
返回

Quality assurance for automatically generated contours with additional deep learning

delete2022-08-17
delete9
delete
OA
AI
L
Lars Johannes Isaksson *
P
Paul Summers
A
Abhir Bhalerao
S
Sara Gandini
S
Sara Raimondi
M
Matteo Pepa
M
Mattia Zaffaroni
G
Giulia Corrao
G
Giovanni Mazzola
M
Marco Rotondi
G
Giuliana Lo Presti
Z
Zaharudin Haron
S
Sara Alessi
P
Paola Pricolo
F
Francesco Alessandro Mistretta
S
Stefano Luzzago
F
Federica Cattani
G
Gennaro Musi
O
Ottavio De Cobelli
M
Marta Cremonesi
R
Roberto Orecchia
G
Giulia Marvaso
G
Giuseppe Petralia
B
Barbara Alicja Jereczek‐Fossa
DOI:10.1186/s13244-022-01276-7delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Objective Deploying an automatic segmentation model in practice should require rigorous quality assurance (QA) and continuous monitoring of the model's use and performance, particularly in high-stakes scenarios such as healthcare. Currently, however, tools to assist with QA for such models are not available to AI researchers. In this work, we build a deep learning model that estimates the quality of automatically generated contours. Methods The model was trained to predict the segmentation quality by outputting an estimate of the Dice similarity coefficient given an image contour pair as input. Our dataset contained 60 axial T2-weighted MRI images of prostates with ground truth segmentations along with 80 automatically generated segmentation masks. The model we used was a 3D version of the EfficientDet architecture with a custom regression head. For validation, we used a fivefold cross-validation. To counteract the limitation of the small dataset, we used an extensive data augmentation scheme capable of producing virtually infinite training samples from a single ground truth label mask. In addition, we compared the results against a baseline model that only uses clinical variables for its predictions. Results Our model achieved a mean absolute error of 0.020 +/- 0.026 (2.2% mean percentage error) in estimating the Dice score, with a rank correlation of 0.42. Furthermore, the model managed to correctly identify incorrect segmentations (defined in terms of acceptable/unacceptable) 99.6% of the time. Conclusion We believe that the trained model can be used alongside automatic segmentation tools to ensure quality and thus allow intervention to prevent undesired segmentation behavior.
Keyword:
Quality assurance (Health care)
Confidence calibration
Diagnostic imaging
Prostate
Magnetic resonance imaging
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Insights into Imaging 封面图
Insights into Imaging
IF:
4.5
论文数:
1.8K
被引数:
7.5K

机构

U
University of Milan
学者数:
5.1W
论文数: 3.9W
被引数: 5.0W
U
University of Warwick
学者数:
2.2W
论文数: 2.2W
被引数: 85
引用论文

引用论文

Spin-spin interaction and relaxation in two trityl-nitroxide diradicals
err2021-11-01
err0
errOAAI
errWhylder Moore; Ru Yao; Yangping Liu; Sandra S. Eaton; Gareth R. Eaton
err分享
err收藏
Automated Quality Assurance of OAR Contouring for Lung Cancer Based on Segmentation With Deep Active Learning
err2020-07-03
err32
errOAAI
errMen, Kuo; Geng, Huaizhi; Biswas, Tithi; Liao, Zhongxing; Xiao, Ying
err分享
err收藏
Clustering Image Search Results by Entity Disambiguation
err2014-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errKaiqi Zhao; Zhiyuan Cai; Qingyu Sui; Enxun Wei; Kenny Q. Zhu
err分享
err收藏
Confidence Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Medical Image Segmentation
err2020-12-01
err184
errOAAI
errMehrtash, Alireza; Wells, William M., III; Tempany, Clare M.; Abolmaesumi, Purang; Kapur, Tina
err分享
err收藏
A framework for automated contour quality assurance in radiation therapy including adaptive techniques
err2015-06-17
err56
PREAI
errAltman, M. B.; Kavanaugh, J. A.; Wooten, H. O.; Green, O. L.; DeWees, T. A.; Gay, H.; Thorstad, W. L.; Li, H.; Mutic, S.
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
In Vitro Flowering in Amaranthus体外开花在Amaranthus
err1988-02-01
err0
PREAI
errBrent Tisserat; Paul D. Galletta
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容