arrow
Return

Quality indicators for capsule endoscopy and deep enteroscopy

delete2022-11-01
delete6
PRE
AI
J
Jonathan A. Leighton *
A
Andrew Brock *
C
Carol E. Semrad *
D
David J. Hass
N
Nalini M. Guda *
J
Jodie A. Barkin *
G
Glenn M. Eisen *
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2022.08.039delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Background and Aims: Capsule endoscopy (CE) and deep enteroscopy (DE) can be useful for diagnosing and treating suspected small-bowel disease. Guidelines and detailed recommendations exist for the use of CE/DE, but comprehensive quality indicators are lacking. The goal of this task force was to develop quality indicators for appropriate use of CE/DE by using a modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Methods: An expert panel of 7 gastroenterologists with diverse practice experience was assembled to identify quality indicators. A literature review was conducted to develop a list of proposed quality indicators applicable to preprocedure, intraprocedure, and postprocedure periods. The panelists reviewed the literature; identified and modified proposed quality indicators; rated them on the basis of scientific evidence, validity, and necessity; and determined proposed performance targets. Agreement and consensus with the proposed indicators were verified using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Results: The voting procedure to prioritize metrics emphasized selecting measures to improve quality and overall patient care. Panelists rated indicators on the perceived appropriateness and necessity for clinical practice. After voting and discussion, 2 quality indicators ranked as inappropriate or uncertain were excluded. Each quality indicator was categorized by measure type, performance target, and summary of evidence. The task force identified 13 quality indicators for CE and DE. Conclusions: Comprehensive quality indicators have not existed for CE or DE. The task force identified quality indicators that can be incorporated into clinical practice. The panel also addressed existing knowledge gaps and posed research questions to better inform future research and quality guidelines for these procedures.
Keywords:
DOUBLE-BALLOON ENTEROSCOPY
DIOXIDE INSUFFLATION IMPROVES
DEVICE-ASSISTED ENTEROSCOPY
SMALL-INTESTINAL STRICTURES
DISORDERS EUROPEAN-SOCIETY
SMALL-BOWEL ANGIOECTASIAS
DISCOVERY SB OVERTUBE
LONG-TERM OUTCOMES
VIDEO CAPSULE
SPIRAL ENTEROSCOPY

Journal

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy cover
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IF:
7.5
Papers:
2.7W
Citations:
2.4W

Organization

U
university of chicago
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 3.7W
Citations: 80
M
mayo clinic
Scholars:
8.1W
Papers: 6.5W
Citations: 85
M
mayo clinic phoenix
Scholars:
6.9K
Papers: 5.5K
Citations: 4
M
Medical University of South Carolina
Scholars:
1.6W
Papers: 1.3W
Citations: 1.4W
U
university of miami
Scholars:
3.3W
Papers: 2.5W
Citations: 32
researcher View more organizations