.png){kind=icon}
返回
Quantitative methods III: Strength in numbers?
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1177/03091325231210512.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
In this third and final report on quantitative methods, I focus on academic community: what we do, what we call ourselves, and why this is a matter of importance for the entire discipline of geography, but especially quantitative human geographers. I first highlight the increasingly diverse ways in which quantitative methods community is produced and manifested, before turning to the shifting, ever-expanding, and overlapping names and labels used to define this group. I argue that, although there is ample evidence that the quantitative methods community is thriving, there is also a growing disconnect from the sub-discipline of quantitative human geography.
Keyword:
human geography
urban science
urban analytics
geospatial
GeoAI
geocomputation
geographic information science
geographic data science
community
期刊
IF:
6.1
论文数:
4.3K
被引数:
9.8K
.png){kind=icon}
查看更多内容