arrow
Return

Radio mode feedback: Does relativity matter?

delete2017-07-21
delete19
delete
OA
AI
M
M. Perucho
V
Vicent Quilis *
M
M. Borja-Lloret
DOI:10.1093/mnrasl/slx115delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Radio mode feedback, associated with the propagation of powerful outflows in active galaxies, is a crucial ingredient in galaxy evolution. Extragalactic jets are well collimated and relativistic, both in terms of thermodynamics and kinematics. They generate strong shocks in the ambient medium, associated with observed hotspots, and carve cavities that are filled with the shocked jet flow. In this Letter, we compare the pressure evolution in the hotspot and the cavity generated by relativistic and classical jets. Our results show that the classical approach underestimates the cavity pressure by a factor >= 2 for a given shocked volume during the whole active phase. The tension between both approaches can only be alleviated by unrealistic jet flow densities or gigantic jet areas in the classical case. As a consequence, the efficiency of a relativistic jet heating the ambient is typically similar to 20 per cent larger compared with a classical jet, and the heated volume is 2 to 10 times larger during the time evolution. This conflict translates into two substantially disparate manners, both spatially and temporal, of heating the ambient medium. These differences are expected to have relevant implications on the star formation rates of the host galaxies and their evolution.
Keywords:
hydrodynamics
relativistic processes
shock waves
galaxies: active
galaxies: jets
X-rays: galaxies: clusters
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society cover
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
IF:
4.8
Papers:
7.0W
Citations:
25.0W

Organization

U
University of Valencia
Scholars:
2.5W
Papers: 2.1W
Citations: 24