arrow
返回

Random Behavior Is Stable Across Tasks and Time

delete2025-04-01
delete0
PRE
AI
T
Tal Boger *
S
Sami R. Yousif *
S
Samuel D. McDougle
R
Robb B. Rutledge
DOI:10.1037/xge0001755delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Whether it's choosing a tennis serve or escaping a predator, the ability to behave randomly provides a range of adaptive benefits. Decades of work explore how people both produce and detect randomness, revealing profound nonrandom biases and heuristics in our mental representations of randomness. But how is randomness realized in the mind? Do individuals have a one-size-fits-all conception of randomness that they employ across different tasks and time points? Or do they instead use simple context-specific strategies? Here, we develop a model that reveals individual differences in how humans attempt to generate random sequences. Then, in three experiments, we reveal that random behavior is stable across both tasks and time. In Experiment 1, participants generated sequences of random numbers and one-dimensional random locations. Behavior was remarkably consistent across the two tasks. In Experiment 2, we gave participants both a random-number-generation and a two-dimensional random-location-generation task, such that the tasks diverged in structure. We again observed stable individual differences across tasks. Finally, in Experiment 3, we collected data from the same participants as in Experiment 2, but 1 year later; we found stable individual differences across that span. Across all experiments, we find idiosyncratic behaviors that are stable across tasks and time. Thus, we suggest that a trait-like randomness generator exists in the mind.
Keyword:
randomness
computational modeling
random generation
statistical biases

期刊

J
Journal of Experimental Psychology-General
IF:
3.5
论文数:
2.9K
被引数:
1.6W

机构

U
university of north carolina
学者数:
7.4W
论文数: 6.5W
被引数: 93
J
Johns Hopkins University
学者数:
10.2W
论文数: 8.8W
被引数: 13.0W
U
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
学者数:
3.9W
论文数: 3.1W
被引数: 46
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息