.png){kind=icon}
返回
Redefining ARDS: a paradigm shift
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1186/s13054-023-04699-w.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Although the defining elements of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have been known for over a century, the syndrome was first described in 1967. Since then, despite several revisions of its conceptual definition, it remains a matter of debate whether ARDS is a discrete nosological entity. After almost 60 years, it is appropriate to examine how critical care has modeled this fascinating syndrome and affected patient's outcome. Given that the diagnostic criteria of ARDS (e.g., increased pulmonary vascular permeability and diffuse alveolar damage) are difficult to ascertain in clinical practice, we believe that a step forward would be to standardize the assessment of pulmonary and extrapulmonary involvement in ARDS to ensure that each patient can receive the most appropriate and effective treatment. The selection of treatments based on arbitrary ranges of PaO2/FiO2 lacks sufficient sensitivity to individualize patient care.
Keyword:
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
Definitions
Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
Mechanical ventilation
Standardization
Stratification
Prognosis
Clinical trials
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
9.3
论文数:
1.0W
被引数:
3.8W
机构
引用论文
The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care人工智能临床医生学习重症监护脓毒症的最佳治疗策略.png)
NATURE MEDICINE
NATURE MEDICINEIF50
PREAI
分享收藏Why are physicians so skeptical about positive randomized controlled clinical trials in critical care medicine?INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINEOAAI
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINEIF21.2
OAAI分享收藏Comparison of the Berlin Definition for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Autopsy柏林急性呼吸窘迫综合征与尸检的定义比较
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容