.png){kind=icon}
返回
Regulating abortion after ectogestation
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1136/jme-2022-108174.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
A few decades from now, it might become possible to gestate fetuses in artificial wombs. Ectogestation as this is called, raises major legal and ethical issues, especially for abortion rights. In countries allowing abortion, regulation often revolves around the viability threshold-the point in fetal development after which the fetus can survive outside the womb. How should viability be understood-and abortion thus regulated-after ectogestation? Should we ban, allow or require the use of artificial wombs as an alternative to standard abortions? Drawing on Cohen, I evaluate three possible positions for the post-ectogestative abortion laws: restrictive, conservative and liberal. While the restrictive position appears untenable, I argue that the liberal and conservative positions can be combined to form a legally and morally coherent basis for post-ectogestative abortion legislation, offering an improvement from the point of both prolife and prochoice positions.
Keyword:
Abortion
Foetal Viability
Law
Reproductive Medicine
期刊
IF:
3.4
论文数:
7.0K
被引数:
6.4K
机构
引用论文
分享收藏MRFS (MATERIAL RECLAMATION FACILITIES) AND MUNICIPAL WASTE - BOLD SUCCESS OR HEROIC FAILURE?MRFS（材料再生设施）与市政废物——大胆的成功还是英勇的失败？
PREAI
分享收藏An extra-uterine system to physiologically support the extreme premature lamb一种在生理上支持极端早产羔羊的子宫外系统.png)
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
OAAI
NATURE COMMUNICATIONSIF15.7
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容