.png){kind=icon}
返回
Reimagining Thriving Ethics Programs without Ethics Committees
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1080/15265161.2023.2276172.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
With the increasing professionalization of clinical ethics, some hospitals and health systems utilize both ethics committees and professional clinical ethicists to address their ethics needs. Drawing upon historical critiques of ethics committees and their own experiences, the authors argue that, in ethics programs with one or more professional clinical ethicists, ethics committees should be dissolved when they fail to meet minimum standards of effectiveness. The authors outline several criteria for assessing effectiveness, describe the benefits of a model that places primary responsibility for ethics work with professional clinical ethicists-the PCE-primary model, and offer suggestions for alternative ethics program structures that empower healthcare professionals to contribute to ethics work in ways more tailored to their strengths and skills while minimizing the shortcomings of ethics committees.
Keyword:
Clinical ethics
ethics committee
clinical ethicist
ethics program
professionalization
quality assessment
期刊
IF:
20.8
论文数:
6.7K
被引数:
4.0K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容