.png){kind=icon}
返回
Reliability in design science research
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/isj.12564.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Reliability, which is concerned with whether something performs as it should, is well-accepted as an important part of any scientific research, with recognised methods for assessing it in the natural sciences. Reliability is a prerequisite for validity, which assesses knowledge production. Design science research is unique in that it produces an artefact and makes contributions to a design knowledge base and is tasked with the duality of design and science. Therefore, reliability should be reconsidered to address the assumptions underlying this type of information systems research.This paper proposes a Design Science Reliability Framework. The framework identifies the part of design science research that should be evaluated (artefact, methods, measures and design knowledge). It also considers when reliability should be assessed as a project progresses by differentiating synchronic versus diachronic evaluation. The framework is used to derive a set of techniques for establishing reliability that can be applied during the evaluation process to both a project's knowledge production and its artefacts. Application of the framework should assist design science researchers when considering how to assess their results.
Keyword:
Design Science Reliability Framework
design science research
diachronic evaluation
reliability
synchronic evaluation
techniques for establishing reliability
期刊
IF:
8.6
论文数:
1.1K
被引数:
6.4K
机构
引用论文
The combination of cisplatin, doxorubicin, and mitomycin (PAM) compared with the FAM regimen in treating advanced gastric carcinoma: A phase II randomized trial of the Italian oncology group for clinical research.png)
Cancer
CancerIF0
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容